The coaching space in the competitive sporting world is overwhelmingly populated by men, prompting Dr Kotryna Fraser, an expert in sport and performance psychology, to ask whether coaching really is a man’s job.
KEY POINTS
Who comes to mind when someone says “Hey, coach!”?
I hope you proved me wrong, but the majority of people most likely have an image of a middle-age white man with a whistle in his hands. I certainly still do. More often than not, such an image is true when talking about high performance coaches.
Look at the Rio 2016 Olympic Games – only 11% of all accredited coaches were female, and according to Norman (2017), almost half of all countries taking part at the Games had no female coaches on their National Team. Female coaches made up only 9% of our Australian National Team at Rio 2016.
Initial stats on the IOC webpage show that there has been slight progress in Tokyo, with women making up 13% of coaches. This figure is subject to change, however, as it did not yet take into account the gender of coaches for the Paralympic Games.
It seems that a stereotypical image of a middle-age white male overseeing athletes’ performance is representative of the actual landscape of elite coaches worldwide.
Rarely do we think about the purpose of sport from a sociocultural perspective. Historically, sport was created by men for men to exercise their aggressiveness, masculinity, and perceived superiority over women, as a response to a new political reality of the 19th century and feminisation (i.e., women becoming more equal at public spaces such as schools and workplaces). Fast-forward to 2020 and women are still perceived to be a weaker and inferior species. Comments such as “boys don’t cry”, “you kick like a girl” or “coaching is a man’s job” illustrate gendered norms still existing in sport.
Importantly, such comments continue to marginalise women and glorify status quo masculine ideals by ignoring our advanced knowledge about such ‘ideals’ (e.g., prevalence of mental health issues among elite athletes and high achievers).
Researchers have identified numerous barriers experienced by female coaches during their careers:
Combined, these barriers can lead to feelings of fraudulence, internalised experiences of failure and inability to recognise success (i.e. imposter feelings) as the sports environment and culture suggests that female coaches simply don’t belong.
The negative experiences and chronic emotional toll put on female coaches often lead to lower job and sport satisfaction, burnout and eventual withdrawal. Numerous qualitative studies indicate that female coaches simply feel tired from constantly battling the existing barriers and eventually give up, which results in less role models other women could follow. This also means that female coaches (and, potentially, male coaches working with feminine sports) fail to achieve their potential.
But it is not only the individual who suffers. We, as a sport community and wider society, are also disadvantaged by the existing gender gap and gendered stereotypes still dominating sports culture. Put bluntly, the talent pool from which we are choosing the best candidates is undiversified and limited in scope. We may think we are using objective criteria, but what we really need is neutral and gender-free criteria.
Perhaps we shouldn’t be surprised that there are only a handful of elite female coaches, or by the lack of female coaches coaching male teams of any level, let alone professional. Language and behaviours constantly remind female coaches that they don’t belong. Stress is placed on the gender of female coaches, but not male; of female sports but not male; of female achievements but not male. Kane (1994) argued that we should move away from a gender segregated understanding and categorisation of sport performance (i.e. male-female binary) towards a continuum based on the skills and competence one demonstrates.
With support from the Olympic Study Centre, Dr Heather Douglas and I, from the University of Newcastle, set out to explore experiences of male and female elite coaches across a variety of sports worldwide through a lens of perceived stereotypes and imposter feelings influencing job coaches’ job satisfaction. While looking at elite coaches will not solve the problem, we hope it will shed more light on how we can do better at the grassroots level to develop a better path to elite coaching for all.
It is, however, a long process requiring all of us to chip in. There are ways we can all play a part in addressing this problem:
It is unlikely that we will ever close the gender gap among higher level coaches, as it is a deeply ingrained societal problem. But why wouldn’t we give it a go so that this and future generations could have a better chance of achieving their full potential? Who knows, maybe this is what we need for new records to be established – more female coaches at elite levels to offer different perspectives and to get the most out of their athletes. It is not about asking the female coaches to fit in, but making much needed change to create an environment suitable for all. After all, why do we keep investing in and learning how to use the newest piece of technology if we fail to do the same with human capital?
REFERENCES
1. Norman, L. Gender and Olympic Coaching Report Card: What’s changed since London 2012? International Council for coaching Excellence, 2017; https://www.icce.ws/_assets/files/norman.pdf
2. Kane, M J & Greendorfer, S L; “The Media’s Role in Accommodating and Resisting Stereotyped Images of Women in Sport”; pp28-44, Women, Media and Sport (edited by Pamela J. Creedon, 1994) click here for more info.
Dr Kotryna Fraser, PhD
Kotryna is an Associate Lecturer in Sport and Performance Psychology at The University of Newcastle.
She is also an accredited Sport and Exercise Scientist (psychology support) under the British Association of Sport and Exercise Scientists (BASES).
Disclaimer: Where Certificate III in Fitness, Cert III/Cert 3, or Fitness Coach is mentioned, it refers to SIS30321 Certificate III in Fitness. Where Certificate IV in Fitness, Cert IV/Cert 4, or Personal Trainer is mentioned, it refers to SIS40221 Certificate IV in Fitness. Where Master Trainer Program™ is mentioned, it refers to Fitness Essentials and SIS40221 Certificate IV in Fitness. Where Master Trainer Plus+ Program™ is mentioned, it refers to SIS30321 Certificate III in Fitness and SIS40221 Certificate IV in Fitness. Where Certificate IV in Massage or Cert IV/Cert 4 is mentioned, it refers to HLT42021 Certificate IV in Massage Therapy. Where Diploma of Remedial Massage is mentioned, it refers to HLT52021 Diploma of Remedial Massage.